Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
---|---|---|---|
Jeskai Monument | comboman | 4-2 | None |
thegrundemer | 0-1 | None |
Boros Monument , Boros Recommission , Izzet Aggro , Jeskai Monument , Jeskai Oculus , Mardu Monument , Rakdos Aggro , Red Deck Wins , Unknown Archetype
Phyrexian Dragon Engine ranks #315 out of approximately 406 cards in raw efficiency (top 78%).
Colorless average: 65.4%
Performance compared to other Colorless cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Phyrexian Dragon Engine is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Performance Efficiency: 4.76 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 3 mana, the average win rate in the format is 73.6%. Phyrexian Dragon Engine has a win rate of 57.1%, making it 22.3% worse than other 3-mana cards.
Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
---|---|---|---|---|
Negate | Instant | 6 | 85.7% | 4 |
Get Lost | Instant | 7 | 81.0% | 5 |
Chandra, Spark Hunter | Legendary Planeswalker — Chandra | 12 | 74.9% | 7 |
Bitter Reunion | Enchantment | 8 | 69.6% | 4 |
Destroy Evil | Instant | 41 | 65.3% | 18 |
Pyroclasm | Sorcery | 27 | 64.3% | 11 |
Screaming Nemesis | Creature — Spirit | 13 | 63.5% | 5 |
Loran of the Third Path | Legendary Creature — Human Artificer | 39 | 63.3% | 16 |
Helping Hand | Sorcery | 45 | 61.2% | 18 |
Recommission | Sorcery | 45 | 61.2% | 18 |
Cards that perform better with Phyrexian Dragon Engine than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
---|
Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
---|---|---|---|
Jeskai Monument | 27 | 87.1% | 63.2% |
Unknown Archetype | 7 | 2.2% | 14.3% |
Jeskai Oculus | 7 | 2.6% | 79.6% |
Mardu Monument | 5 | 83.3% | 57.5% |
Red Deck Wins | 2 | 0.1% | 0.0% |
Statistic | Description | Formula |
---|---|---|
Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.